Join Us as a Judge for the Glonary Awards and Make a Difference in Recognizing Excellence!

We invite experienced professionals and business leaders to play an active role in the selection process for one of the industry’s most prestigious awards. By becoming a judge, you will help evaluate outstanding innovations and achievements, directly contributing to honoring the most deserving recipients. Your expertise will shape the standards of recognition, celebrating exceptional talents and innovations. This is your opportunity to influence the future of excellence—apply today to join the Glonary Awards judging panel!

No costs or payments involved: Participating as a judge is completely voluntary and does not involve any fees or remuneration. Your role is based solely on your experience and professional expertise. No payments are required for consideration, and no guarantees of selection can be made.

Thoughtful selection process: Not every applicant is immediately chosen to be a judge. Our recruitment process carefully selects professionals who bring valuable insights and perspectives to the awards. With 10 unique awards programs, we add judges based on specific needs for each category.

Complete a minimum of 50 reviews: Upon selection, judges are required to successfully complete at least 50 reviews before qualifying for eCertificates. You’ll assess submissions from professionals across a wide range of industries and global markets.

Esteemed peer recognition: Judges are chosen for their established expertise and ability to provide meaningful evaluations. This peer-driven recognition ensures only top professionals contribute to the selection process.

Professional credibility: Serving as a judge demonstrates your high level of skill and knowledge. Glonary Awards judges are accomplished professionals who have excelled in their fields, capable of providing deep insights and fair evaluations.

Making an impact: Acting as a judge reflects your influence and leadership within your industry. Your efforts will contribute to maintaining and elevating standards of excellence across various sectors.

Eligibility criteria and transparency: Not all applications are approved. We seek qualified professionals capable of delivering thoughtful evaluations. Any participant found unsuitable during the audit process will lose their judging role and related access.

Public listing for accountability: To ensure transparency and uphold the credibility of the Glonary Awards, all judges are publicly listed on the official website. By agreeing to serve, you consent to have your name, title, and professional affiliations displayed. This visibility highlights your contribution and bolsters the awards’ integrity and reputation.

Commitment required – Apply only if you can dedicate time and effort: Judging for the Glonary Awards demands a serious commitment. Applicants should be ready to thoroughly review submissions and provide insightful feedback. Your participation is critical to maintaining the high standards that define the Glonary Awards.

Introduction to Glonary Awards Judges

Discover the Role and Significance of Glonary Awards Judges

The Glonary Awards judges are a group of dedicated professionals who volunteer their expertise to assess and score nominations submitted for consideration. Representing a wide range of industries and backgrounds, these judges are not financially compensated for their efforts. They are committed to maintaining fairness, transparency, and integrity throughout the awards process, utilizing their comprehensive understanding of the evaluation criteria to ensure a balanced and unbiased outcome.

Our judges are seasoned experts, executives, and specialists from diverse fields who bring extensive knowledge and experience to the table. Selected for their leadership qualities, industry insights, and ability to assess submissions objectively, these professionals are tasked with scoring entries against clearly defined criteria. Their role is crucial in ensuring that only the most deserving nominations receive recognition, thus upholding the prestige of the Glonary Awards.

Why You Should Volunteer as a Glonary Awards Judge

Harness the Power of Recognition and Impact

As a volunteer judge for the esteemed Glonary Awards, you have the unique opportunity to shape the future of recognition by honoring outstanding achievements across various sectors. By reviewing and scoring submissions, you play a pivotal role in highlighting exceptional talent and innovation. Joining our panel offers you access to industry trends, an expanded professional network, and a chance to contribute meaningfully to a global initiative celebrating excellence. Apply today to experience the pride of recognizing extraordinary accomplishments while furthering your professional growth.

What to Expect as a Judge

Time Commitment and Process

Judges are expected to dedicate a reasonable amount of time, completing at least 50 assignments, with each evaluation requiring no more than 15 minutes. While some reviews may take less time, the total commitment averages around 12.5 hours. Importantly, no physical attendance is required; all evaluations are conducted online at your convenience.

Security and Confidentiality

To ensure the integrity of the judging process, judges are prohibited from downloading, copying, or capturing any content from the secure judges’ portal. This policy safeguards the confidentiality of submissions and upholds the professionalism and ethical standards of the Glonary Awards.

Requesting Employer Approval

Subject: Request for Approval to Serve as a Judge for the Glonary Awards

Dear [Manager’s Name],

I am writing to seek your approval to participate as a judge for the prestigious Glonary Awards. This role involves reviewing submissions and helping identify industry-leading achievements in categories relevant to our field.


Benefits to the Company:

1. Professional Development: This opportunity will enhance my knowledge of industry innovations and best practices, which I can apply in our projects.
2. Enhanced Visibility: My involvement positions our company as a leader with recognized experts contributing to industry standards.
3. Knowledge Sharing: Insights gained can be shared with our team, benefiting strategic initiatives and operational improvements.

The judging process is conducted entirely online, with flexible scheduling to ensure minimal disruption to my regular responsibilities.

I am committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards, avoiding conflicts of interest, and representing our organization with professionalism.

Thank you for considering my request. I am happy to provide further details if needed.

Best regards,
[Your Name]

Template for Employer’s Approval

[Employer’s Letterhead]

Subject: Approval for [Employee’s Name] to Participate as a Glonary Awards Judge

[Date]

To Whom It May Concern,

This letter confirms our support for [Employee’s Full Name], [Job Title], to serve as a judge for the upcoming Glonary Awards. We believe that [his/her/their] expertise in [specific field] and professional accomplishments make [him/her/them] an excellent candidate for this role.

We are confident that [Employee’s Name] will contribute significantly to the awards process and represent our organization with distinction.

Sincerely,
[Employer’s Name]
[Job Title]
[Organization]

How Will a Judge Get Access?

Most categories are judged online. The scoring process will take you a few minutes to as much time as you can volunteer to read and score in our online judging system, anytime day or night. You may start or stop the process anytime.

As a judge, it will be an opportunity for you to learn how other individuals, teams, and organizations are performing, confronting challenges, and achieving success in the industry.

You’ll also receive an eCertificate of appreciation suitable for sharing online, and on social media, and be acknowledged with your biography on the Glonary Awards website.

Your contact details will be safe and not shared with anyone.

Selection Process and Criteria

Email Policy – Use only work/business email

Please note that the Glonary Awards is exclusively for working and business professionals. We do not respond to personal or generic email addresses, regardless of the number of reminders sent. We will only reply to your work or business email. If your work or business email has changed, please send us a message with your new email address and mention your previous work or business email so that we can accurately connect your participation. If you are currently in-between jobs, please pause and communicate once you have received your new work or business email.

Learn How Judges are Chosen and the Criteria for Selection

Glonary Awards takes great care in selecting judges with extensive industry experience and expertise. The criteria for selecting judges is based on their knowledge, qualifications, and accomplishments in their respective fields. Judges are chosen through a rigorous process that evaluates their background, professional achievements, and commitment to maintaining impartiality and integrity throughout the judging process. This ensures that only the most qualified individuals, who possess a deep understanding of the industry and exhibit fair judgment, are responsible for evaluating award entries.

• Extensive Industry Experience: Glonary Awards selects judges with a wealth of experience in their respective industries. They bring valuable insights and expertise to the judging process.
• Qualifications and Accomplishments: Judges are chosen based on their qualifications, such as relevant educational background, certifications, and notable field achievements. This ensures they have the necessary knowledge and credentials to assess the award entries.
• Impartiality and Integrity: Glonary Awards emphasizes maintaining impartiality and integrity in the judging process. Judges are selected based on their commitment to fairness and ability to evaluate entries objectively.
• Rigorous Selection Process: The selection of judges involves a thorough evaluation of their background, experience, and professional achievements. This process ensures that only the most qualified individuals are chosen for the judging panel.
• Industry Knowledge and Understanding: Judges are selected for their deep understanding of the industry in which the awards program operates. This enables them to assess entries based on industry-specific criteria and standards.
• Commitment to Confidentiality: Judges are required to adhere to strict confidentiality guidelines. They are entrusted with the sensitive information in the award entries and must maintain confidentiality throughout the evaluation process.
• Diversity and Inclusion: Glonary Awards strives to have a diverse panel of judges representing different backgrounds, perspectives, and expertise. This ensures a well-rounded evaluation of the entries and promotes inclusivity in the judging process.
• Continuous Learning and Development: Judges are encouraged to stay up-to-date with the latest trends and developments in their respective industries through constant learning. This helps them provide informed and insightful evaluations of the award entries.
• Adherence to Judging Guidelines: Judges follow specific guidelines provided by Glonary Awards to ensure consistency and fairness in the evaluation process. These guidelines help maintain a standardized approach to judging and ensure that all entries are assessed using the same criteria.
• Feedback and Improvement: Glonary Awards values judges’ feedback to enhance the judging process. It actively seeks input from judges to improve the awards program and ensure a better experience for all participants.

Overall, the selection of judges for the Glonary Awards is based on their extensive industry experience, qualifications, impartiality, and adherence to integrity. This ensures a fair and credible judging process recognizing excellence in various fields.

Exploring the Benefits and Privileges of Glonary Awards Judges

A participating judge receives the following:

• An eBadge and eCertificate emailed after scoring at least 50 assignments.
• Judge’s full name published on Glonary Awards website with a link to an external site such as LinkedIn for profile.

The Benefits and Privileges of being a Glonary Awards Judge include:

• Industry Recognition: Judges gain recognition as industry experts and thought leaders in their respective fields by being associated with a prestigious awards program like Glonary Awards.
• Networking Opportunities: Judges can connect and network with other industry professionals, fellow judges, and potential collaborators within the Glonary Awards community.
• Access to Cutting-Edge Innovations: Judges get exclusive access to innovative products, services, and business practices showcased in the award entries. This exposure lets them stay informed about the latest industry trends and advancements.
• Professional Development: Serving as a judge for Glonary Awards enhances professional development by expanding industry knowledge, staying updated on best practices, and gaining insights into emerging trends.
• Enhanced Reputation: Being a Glonary Awards Judge adds credibility and enhances professional reputation, as it signifies expertise and involvement in recognizing excellence in the industry.
• Valuable Experience: Serving as a judge provides practical experience in evaluating and assessing entries based on specific criteria, honing critical thinking and judgment abilities.
• Contribution to the Industry: Judges play a crucial role in recognizing and promoting outstanding achievements in their industries. Their evaluations and feedback help drive excellence and inspire innovation within the business community.
• Personal and Professional Growth: The judging experience provides opportunities for personal and professional growth by exposing individuals to diverse ideas and perspectives, as well as allowing them to evaluate and analyze innovative solutions.
• Access to Judge’s Portal: Judges gain access to a dedicated Judge’s Portal, which provides them with a user-friendly platform to review and evaluate entries, access judging guidelines and criteria, and submit their evaluations securely.
• Recognition and Appreciation: Glonary Awards acknowledges the valuable contribution of judges and expresses gratitude through certificates of appreciation, recognition on the website, and opportunities to showcase their expertise.

Overall, serving as a Glonary Awards Judge offers numerous benefits and privileges, including industry recognition, networking opportunities, access to innovations, professional development, enhanced reputation, valuable experience, contribution to the industry, personal and professional growth, access to the Judge’s Portal, and recognition and appreciation for their contribution.

Do Professionals Have to Pay to Participate as a Judge in the Glonary Awards?

No, professionals do not have to pay to participate as a judge in the Glonary Awards. Our judges are selected based on their expertise, professional achievements, and contributions to their respective industries. We firmly believe in recognizing and valuing the experience and knowledge that our judges bring, without any financial obligations. Sponsorships or payments do not influence the selection of judges; each judge is chosen purely on merit. Participation as a judge is a prestigious and voluntary role, offering opportunities for professional growth, networking, and the satisfaction of contributing to the recognition of excellence across various fields. This approach ensures the integrity and impartiality of our judging process.

Judges at the Glonary Awards are selected based on their expertise, professional achievements, and contributions to their respective fields. Active participation in the judging process offers several benefits, including recognition on a global platform, networking opportunities with industry leaders, and the satisfaction of contributing to the growth and success of the industry. It’s important to note that being a judge at the Glonary Awards does not require any form of payment or sponsorship; our selection process ensures that judges are chosen purely on their credentials and experience, maintaining the integrity and impartiality of the awards.

Awards Programs for Judges

Exciting Opportunities to Participate as a Judge
These are the 9 award programs for which you can participate as a judge. You will receive a separate certificate for each awards program.

• Glonary® Awards for American Business
• Glonary® Awards for Business (International)
• Glonary® Awards for Influencers & Infobusiness
• Glonary® Awards for Cybersecurity
• Glonary® Awards for Young Innovators
• Glonary® Golden Bridge Awards
• Glonary® Awards for Technology & Design
• Glonary® Awards for Business Leaders
• Glonary® Awards for Women In Business

You may submit your application immediately, but approvals and access will be given as and when the judging period commences. Submitting an application earlier will ensure your application is processed first.

Please note: You have to complete a separate application for each awards program for each new year in which you want to be a judge. You will receive a separate eCertificate for each awards program for which you will be accepted as a judge.

Please keep the same email login for all the award programs so that you can see everything with one login.

Important Dates and Deadlines for the Judging Process

There are 9 different awards and judging for each happens during the periods listed below. If you have applied to participate as one of the judges then you will receive judge’s confirmation only when the judging period has commenced. You may apply to participate as a judge in any number of awards listed below. Judge’s will receive a separate eCertificate for each awards program.

Understanding the Process for Approval as a Glonary Awards Judge

After submitting your application to become a judge, it will be reviewed by the Glonary team. If approved, you will receive an official approval letter once the judging period begins. Note that each awards program may have its own specific judging period.

Reasons for Delays in Approval:

1. Non-Professional Email Address: Using personal email domains like @gmail, @yahoo, or @aol may result in longer approval times.
2. Incomplete Employment Verification: Failing to provide links or proof of your professional status can delay the approval process.
3. Lack of Professional Photo: A professional photo is required to complete your judge profile.

Frequently Asked Questions:

Q: I recently submitted an application to participate as a judge. What should I expect next?
A: After applying, you will receive an email stating that your judging request is being reviewed. Once reviewed, you'll receive a confirmation email when the judging period for your chosen awards program begins.

Q: How long should I wait for confirmation?
A: Each awards program has a specific judging period, ranging from 1 to 3 months. You will only receive approval after the judging period has commenced.

Q: When will my profile be published, and when will I receive my eCertificate?
A: Your profile will be published after you complete at least 50 assignments. eCertificates are awarded only after all winners have been announced.

Q: Can I apply to judge multiple Glonary awards programs, and will I receive an eCertificate for each one?
A: Yes, you can apply to participate in multiple programs. A separate application is required for each one, and you will receive an eCertificate for each program you successfully judge.

Reasons Your Application Might Not Be Accepted

At the Glonary Awards, we uphold a high standard of excellence and integrity. If your application is not accepted, it may be due to the following reasons:

• Non-Professional Email: Only work or business email addresses are accepted.
• Email Domain Mismatch: Your email domain must match your place of employment or business.
• Lack of Employment Proof: You need to provide verifiable proof of employment, such as a LinkedIn profile or official company website.
• Incompatible Professional Background: If your expertise doesn’t align with the judging requirements for a particular program, your application may be declined.
• Incomplete Assignments in Previous Programs: Inconsistent completion of previous assignments may affect your eligibility.
• Lack of Scores or Professional Comments: Judges are expected to provide scores and professional feedback for all assignments.
• Verification Issues: If we can't verify your professional background or credentials, your application may be rejected.
• Duplicate Applications: Submitting multiple applications using different emails for the same awards program may lead to disqualification.

Email Policy and Judge Transparency Requirements

To maintain the integrity of the Glonary Awards, we verify email domains against your LinkedIn profile. Using personal or university emails may delay or invalidate your application. Additionally, all judges' full names and LinkedIn profiles are publicly displayed on the Glonary Awards website, ensuring transparency.

Disqualification and Permanent Bans

Judges can be disqualified or permanently banned from future participation for the following reasons:

• Providing False Information: Inaccurate details about your background or qualifications may result in disqualification.
• Unprofessional Behavior: Any rude or unprofessional conduct during communications or judging may lead to removal.
• Unauthorized Use or Disclosure of Assignment Content: Sharing or reproducing assignment content without permission will result in a permanent ban.
• Sharing Assignment Content: Judges must not share assignment materials with nominees or others outside the judging process.

These measures are in place to ensure the confidentiality and fairness of the Glonary Awards judging process.

How Assignments Are Counted

Once your application is approved, you will receive an email within 48 hours indicating that assignments have been added to your account for review and scoring.

• Minimum Scoring Requirement: You may need to complete at least 50 assignments to qualify for judge benefits.
• Recused Assignments: If you recuse yourself from an assignment, it will not count towards your total, and a new task will be issued in its place.
• Disqualified Assignments: If assignments are disqualified, additional assignments will be provided to replace them.

This system ensures that all judges complete the necessary tasks while maintaining the integrity of the awards process.

Scoring Assignments

Accessing the Judge Portal

STEP 1: Log in to your account to access the Judging Panel.

STEP 2: Click “Continue into Judge Portal” to proceed.

STEP 3: You will see sections for # Pending, # Judges, and Action. Click “Open” under the Action section.

STEP 4: Select VIEW APPLICATION.

STEP 5: Read the full application on the left for each nomination.

• Review all the URLs and attachments submitted.
• Score each nomination on a scale of 1 to 10.
• Provide judge comments, noting what you liked or disliked about the nomination. Be sure to keep your comments professional and polite.

STEP 6: You can choose to:

• “Cancel and Go Back,”
• “Save and Back to List,”
• “Save and Go to Next.”

Note: You can stop scoring at any time and return to your work later by selecting VIEW APPLICATION.

Glonary Awards Judging Process: A Data-Driven Scoring System

The Glonary Awards uses a data-driven approach to ensure fairness, consistency, and transparency in its judging process. This structured method is the foundation for recognizing the best in the industry.

How the Glonary Awards Scoring Works

Our objective, data-driven scoring evaluates nominations across four key criteria, minimizing subjectivity and focusing on measurable achievements. The areas assessed include:

1. Achievement: Evaluates the nominee's most notable accomplishment.
2. Main Content: Assesses the depth, clarity, and relevance of the submission essay.
3. Summary: Judges the impact and conciseness of the key highlights summarizing why the nominee deserves recognition.
4. Supporting Materials: Evaluates the relevance and credibility of any supplemental content, such as URLs or attachments.

Scoring Scale

Judges use the following standardized scale to assign scores:

The total score for each nomination is the sum of all four criteria, resulting in a final score out of 10.

Award Levels

The final score determines the award level:

Judge Responsibilities

As a judge, you are responsible for:

1. Thoroughly Reviewing Each Nomination

• Read and analyze all parts of each submission, including supporting materials.
• Ensure the achievement aligns with the criteria.
• Allocate adequate time for a fair evaluation.

2. Assigning Scores Objectively

• Apply the scoring scale consistently across all nominations.
• Focus solely on the information provided, avoiding personal biases.

3. Completing Assignments on Time

• Follow all submission deadlines to maintain the integrity of the judging process.

Why the Data-Driven Method is Superior

Fair and Objective

The Glonary Awards’ structured scoring system ensures consistency and fairness in judging. By eliminating subjectivity, we provide clear and measurable evaluations.

Transparent and Credible

The final scores are calculated mathematically, ensuring no room for bias or manipulation. The clearly defined process also ensures nominees understand how their entries are judged.

Global Expertise

Our judges are industry leaders from around the world, offering diverse perspectives while maintaining consistency in scoring. This global approach guarantees that winners meet a world-class standard.

Encourages Excellence

The scoring thresholds for Gold, Silver, and Bronze awards ensure that only those demonstrating significant achievements are recognized. Achieving Gold requires four “Well Done” scores, reflecting outstanding performance.

Innovative and Scalable

This modern, efficient, and scalable method allows the Glonary Awards to handle a large volume of nominations without compromising quality.

Judges: Upholding the Glonary Awards’ Gold Standard

As a judge, your role is essential in upholding the Glonary Awards’ reputation for excellence. By scoring impartially and fairly, you help ensure that every nominee is recognized for their deserving achievements.

If you have questions about the judging process or the scoring criteria, please contact the Glonary Awards team at [email address].

Thank you for your participation! Your expertise and commitment help the Glonary Awards honor excellence across industries worldwide.

Guidelines and Best Practices for Evaluating Submissions

Scoring Process

Each entry is carefully reviewed and assigned a score by the judges on a scale of 1 to 10, based on the following criteria:

• Excellent (Score: 10)
• Very Good (Score: 9)
• Good (Score: 8)
• Above Average (Score: 7)
• Average (Score: 6)
• Ordinary (Score: 5)
• Below Average (Score: 4)
• Poor (Score: 3)
• Poorest (Score: 2)
• Avoid (Score: 1)

How Scores Decide Winners

The scores given by all judges are compiled, and an average score is calculated for each entry. Based on these average scores, the winners are categorized as follows:

Winners

• Gold: Typically, an average score of 9 to 10.
• Silver: Typically, an average score of 8 to 8.99.
• Bronze: Typically, an average score of 7 to 7.99.

Non-Winners

Entries with average scores ranging from 0 to 6.99 are considered non-winners. These submissions generally lack quality and will not likely qualify for a Bronze award or any higher recognition. It is crucial to ensure that scores below 7 are carefully considered before assigning.

Scoring Considerations

When assigning a score, keep in mind the following factors:

1. Achievement: Has the nominee clearly highlighted a significant accomplishment? Nominees are generally expected to focus on one main achievement per entry.
2. Supporting Essay/Video: Does the nominee provide a detailed explanation of their achievement through written or video content?
3. Supporting Materials: Has the nominee included sufficient content to substantiate their claims?
4. Startups Categories: For startups, does the nominee provide evidence of their founding year, along with a clear description of one major achievement?

Recusing from Assignments

Scoring Assignments Without Industry Expertise
For categories requiring more general knowledge or not specific to a certain industry, judges should rely heavily on the provided content. In these cases, the relevance and quality of supporting materials are crucial.

Recusal as a Judge
If you believe you are not qualified to score an assignment due to potential conflicts of interest or lack of impartiality, you may recuse yourself. Please provide a reason for recusal to ensure transparency.

Judge’s Comments Guidelines

We ask judges to provide constructive and thoughtful feedback for each entry. Your comments help entrants understand their strengths and areas for improvement. These comments will be visible only to the nominees, maintaining the anonymity of the judges and ensuring fairness.

Constructive Feedback:

• Provide personalized, actionable insights. Focus on strengths and areas for improvement, highlighting specific aspects of each entry.
• Avoid generic comments. Tailor your feedback to each entry, discussing the application’s unique features.
• Use professional and respectful language, maintaining anonymity.

Impact of Comments
Your feedback is crucial for the entrants’ development and may also be used in their marketing efforts. Your comments can have a lasting impact on their professional growth.

Guidelines for Providing Feedback to Entrants

At the Glonary Awards, we encourage judges to provide valuable, personalized feedback. Below are guidelines for writing effective comments:

1. Be Specific
Focus on particular aspects of the entry, such as innovation, impact, or presentation. Highlight what stood out and provide details for improvement.
Example:
"The section on your product's market impact was particularly strong, but the implementation could benefit from a more detailed timeline."

2. Be Constructive
Acknowledge both strengths and areas for improvement. Offer clear, actionable suggestions that can guide the entrant in refining future submissions.
Example:
"While the concept is innovative, presenting clearer data to support your claims would strengthen your argument."

3. Be Balanced
Ensure your feedback includes both positive remarks and constructive suggestions. This balanced approach motivates the entrant while offering a clear direction for improvement.
Example:
"Your research was thorough, but I recommend refining the visuals for clearer presentation."

4. Personalize the Feedback
Tailor your comments to the specific entry. This ensures that feedback is meaningful and directly relevant to the submission.
Example:
"In your project’s execution, I noticed the thorough attention to detail in the user experience design, which enhanced its overall impact."

5. Use a Standardized Format
To maintain consistency, consider using specific prompts when giving feedback. This helps create clarity while allowing judges to provide unique perspectives.

Example Prompts:

• What part of the submission stood out to you and why?
• In what way did the submission demonstrate innovation?
• How could the submission improve in future iterations?

Understanding the Glonary Awards Scoring Guidelines

The Glonary Awards celebrate excellence across various sectors, and as a judge, your role is essential in maintaining the integrity and prestige of the awards. By following these scoring guidelines, we ensure that each submission is assessed in a fair, transparent, and consistent manner.

Scoring Scale

• 10: Excellence – The entry sets the standard for innovation, execution, and impact within its category, serving as a benchmark for others to follow.
• 9.0 to 9.9 (Gold): Outstanding Achievement – This entry displays exceptional quality, surpassing most expectations in its field, making it worthy of the prestigious Gold Glonary distinction.
• 8.0 to 8.9 (Silver): Excellent – The entry demonstrates superior performance and innovation, deserving recognition as a Silver Glonary winner.
• 7.0 to 7.9 (Bronze): Very Good – The entry shows commendable quality and achievement, meriting the Bronze Glonary recognition.

Entries with scores within these ranges are considered winners and will receive the appropriate award based on their average score across all judges.

Guidelines for Scoring

• Objective Evaluation: Assess each entry based on its merits, using the criteria defined for its category. Consider factors such as innovation, impact, execution, and overall quality.
• Constructive Feedback: Provide helpful feedback, especially for entries scoring below 7.0, to assist participants in improving and resubmitting.
• Use the Full Scale: Be thoughtful and use the entire scoring scale to differentiate between varying levels of achievement.
• Consistency and Fairness: Maintain consistency across evaluations. Review scores collectively to ensure they accurately represent the differences in achievement levels.
• Consideration for a Score of 0: Review the entry thoroughly before assigning a 0, ensuring it truly meets the criteria for this score, as it indicates a failure to meet the standard for recognition and may include false or misleading information.

The average score of all participating judges will determine the distinction for each entry. It is crucial to uphold diligence and integrity to maintain the high standards of the Glonary Awards.

Anonymity of Judges

As a judge, it’s essential to remain anonymous while providing your feedback. Your scores and comments are anonymous, ensuring that nominees cannot trace their scores back to individual judges. This encourages a fair and open evaluation process.

While offering comments, be polite, respectful, and constructive. Your feedback should focus on the entry’s strengths and areas for improvement, without revealing your identity. This anonymity upholds fairness and impartiality in the evaluation process.

Judges’ Profile, eBadge, eCertificate, Reference Letter

• Judges’ Profiles: Moving forward, only the judge's full name and organization will be published alongside a link to their LinkedIn profile. This ensures that the most current and comprehensive information is available.

• Timeline: Judges who complete at least 50 assignments will have their full name and LinkedIn profile published on the judges’ page after winners are announced.

• Recognition for Judges: Judges who complete 50 assignments or more for any awards program will receive an eBadge and eCertificate specific to that program. Judges who complete fewer than 50 assignments will be acknowledged with a special ‘Thank You’ mention on the judges’ page.

• Printed Certificates: Starting in 2024, printed certificates will no longer be mailed, though they can be purchased by those wishing for a physical copy. The production and shipping time frame is 6-8 weeks after the confirmed order.

• Reference Letters: Judges completing at least 50 assignments are eligible for a reference letter, which will be issued digitally through services such as Docusign.

• Work/Business Email: Judges must maintain an up-to-date work or business email for communication and verification purposes. Changes to email can affect the issuance of eBadges and eCertificates.

Judges who complete fewer than 10 assignments will not be eligible for any recognitions. However, their contributions will be acknowledged on the judges’ page under “Participating Judges Acknowledgment.”

These updates reflect our dedication to recognizing the contributions of our judges and maintaining transparency about their professional credentials. We greatly value their involvement, which plays a key role in the success of the Glonary Awards.

Resources for Judges

Disclaimer Regarding Use of Glonary Awards Recognition

The Glonary Awards honor excellence in various fields. Participation as a judge or recipient of an award signifies an individual’s or organization’s noteworthy contribution to their field. However, the Glonary Awards and its affiliates do not guarantee or imply any professional benefits, such as immigration approvals, visa status changes, or employment advancements, related to judging or winning status. Misuse of award recognition for such purposes is discouraged, and the Glonary Awards disclaim responsibility for any misinterpretation or misuse.

Background Images Judge’s May Use on Social Media

You may download the following background and use as profile background on LinkedIn

Requesting a Reference Letter from Glonary Awards

At the Glonary Awards, we are currently handling an exceptionally high number of reference letter requests, with over a thousand pending. We understand the significance of these letters and are committed to processing them as efficiently as possible. However, due to the large volume, processing each request manually has become challenging.

To streamline the process and ensure timely handling, we kindly request that you use digital signature platforms such as DocuSign, HelloSign, or other similar services. This approach has proven to expedite request processing significantly in the past.

For your convenience, we have provided a step-by-step guide on how to utilize these digital services. You can access this guide through the Glonary Awards Reference Letter Procedure.

Please note that due to the current request volume, we are unable to accept email attachments for reference letter requests at this time.

We truly appreciate your understanding and cooperation during this busy period. Thank you for being part of the Glonary Awards community and for your continued support.

Can a Judge Apply for an Award?

At the Glonary Awards, we uphold fairness and equality for all participants, including our esteemed judges. If a judge wishes to submit their own entries, they must follow the same application process, undergo the same review procedure, and pay any applicable fees as any other participant. This ensures a fair competition and upholds the integrity of the awards.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Who can apply to be a judge?
Anyone who is a business owner or employed professional in any industry, from anywhere in the world, can apply to be a judge. Simply complete the "Apply to be a Judge" form for the awards program you wish to volunteer for.

Who is selected as a judge?
From the thousands of applications we receive for each program, we select only those with significant industry expertise and qualifications. We value the insights and experience these experts bring to the judging process. Every year, thousands of judges from diverse industries participate, and their average scores determine the Glonary Awards winners.

Can a person submit nominations and also participate as a judge?
Yes, a judge can submit their own nominations; however, they cannot score their own entries. They are still eligible to score all other nominations.

What is the judging process?
The Glonary Awards judging process is structured to ensure fairness, transparency, and integrity. Here are the main steps:

• Judge Selection: Judges are carefully chosen based on their expertise, industry experience, and accomplishments.
• Assignment of Entries: Judges are assigned a set number of entries to evaluate (typically around 50), ensuring each entry is reviewed by multiple judges.
• Review and Scoring: Judges assess each entry based on predefined criteria and provide scores and detailed feedback.
• Confidentiality and Integrity: Judges adhere to strict confidentiality agreements and ethical guidelines to maintain fairness.
• Consensus and Finalization: Scores are aggregated, and discussions may occur to reach consensus on the best entries.
• Announcement of Winners: The winners are finalized and announced based on judges’ scores and feedback.
• Feedback and Improvement: Feedback from judges helps improve the process for future editions.

This transparent and rigorous process ensures the Glonary Awards celebrate true excellence and innovation.

What are the requirements for Glonary Awards judges to receive the full benefits of participation, and what happens if assignments are not satisfactorily completed?
To qualify for full benefits, judges must complete at least 50 assignments. If assignments are deemed unsatisfactory by the Glonary Awards Judging Committee, the judge may be removed from further participation, and their scores will be nullified. Judges who complete fewer than 50 assignments will be acknowledged on the website but will not be eligible for full benefits.

If a judge recuses themselves from any assignments, they must complete an equal number of additional tasks to reach 50 assignments.

How are judges assigned categories to score?
Categories are assigned based on the judge's industry, function, and work experience by Glonary Awards staff.

Can a judge withdraw from the Glonary Awards judging process?
Yes, judges have the right to withdraw from the judging process at any time. If they decide to do so, their assignments will be reassigned to maintain fairness in the evaluation.

How do I receive a judge’s eCertificate?
Judges who complete at least 50 assignments will be eligible to receive an eCertificate, which will be issued after the winners are announced.

Can a judge be disqualified for violating Glonary Awards policies even after completing 50 assignments?
Yes, if a judge violates any policies, such as exhibiting bias, conflicts of interest, or unprofessional behavior, they may be disqualified, even after completing 50 assignments. Maintaining the integrity of the awards process is paramount.